The two lowest-priced trade AI receptionists, compared on what you'd actually pay and what you'd actually get.
These are the two cheapest trade-focused AI receptionists we track. OnCrew is cheaper to start ($49), has a much longer trial (14 days, no card), includes Spanish, and texts or transfers urgent calls to your on-call tech. Jobholler is flat-priced, so a huge month doesn't cost more, and its Core plan adds Google review requests.
| OnCrew | Jobholler | |
|---|---|---|
| Plans | $49 · $149 · $349 | $85 · $149 · $399 |
| Billing | 100 / 400 / 1,000 answered calls, then $0.99/call | Flat; call length doesn't change price |
| Numbers/lines | 1 / 2 / 5 | 1 / 1 / 3 |
| Urgent calls | Text alerts to on-call; announced live transfers | Email lead alerts (routing & handoff on Pro) |
| Spanish | Included, no surcharge | Not listed on current pricing page |
| Calendar | Google Calendar appointment requests | Quick-book self-scheduling on Pro |
| Review requests | No | Google review requests on Core+ |
| Trial | 14 days, no card (auto-extends once if low volume) | 3 days |
| Refund | 30-day money-back | Not stated |
| Cancel | Dashboard, month to month | Account → Billing |
| Answered calls / month | OnCrew | Jobholler (cheapest plan) |
|---|---|---|
| 50 | $49 | $85 |
| 150 | $98.50 (Starter + 50 extra) | $85 |
| 300 | $149 (Pro) | $85 |
| 800 | $349 (Multi-Truck) | $85 |
| 1,200 | $349 + 200 × $0.99 = $547 | $85 |
On paper, Jobholler Starter gets cheaper than OnCrew once you pass about 136 answered calls a month. But the plans aren't the same product: OnCrew's $49 includes live transfers, on-call text alerts and recordings that Jobholler's $85 Starter doesn't list. Compare by the features you'll actually use.
OnCrew starts lower ($49 vs $85). At high call volumes Jobholler's flat pricing can be cheaper, because OnCrew charges $0.99 per call past your plan.
OnCrew: 14 days with no card. Jobholler: 3 days.
OnCrew includes Latin American Spanish at no extra charge. Jobholler's current pricing page doesn't list Spanish.
Not yet; this comparison uses each vendor's published pricing and FAQs (checked October 16, 2026).